Put THAT in your crack pipe and SMOKE IT Ukraine!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted to Reddit Saturday 12th March 2022

We all know that no one was allowed to even mention Hunter Biden’s dealings in Ukraine before the election, right?

Hello you 5.1 million brilliant Russian trolls, paid for bot subscriptions, and moistened gussets! Join me as we Great Awaken to the idea that Russell Brand is a soulless goon. Just a reminder, Russell is touring the UK at the moment if you do want to protest any of his shows, it’s not too late.

Just a short one from me today, on the 11th of March Russell posted a YouTube of himself reading out this article from the Guardian.

In his preamble he stated how no one spoke about the Biden’s dealings in Ukraine before the election. Funny that, considering the fact that Trump’s first impeachment was about him trying to blackmail Ukraine into providing dirt on Biden. Biden, Burisma and Ukraine had been a significant topic of media attention for the last two years of Trump’s presidency. Not sure how Russell missed all that, maybe having his head jammed up his own arse is an impediment?

Then Russell moves on to the article for some of his favorite past time of cherry picking! He reads it pretty much verbatim, except he jumps over any bits that draw parallels between Hunter’s foreign dealings and the trump kids. Huh? For a “both sides” kinda guy, he’s always kinda one sided.

Russell moves on to an extended riff about how the president’s family shouldn’t be able to do business in Ukraine or China (well, Biden’s anyway). Personally not saying he’s wrong, but how does this gel with Russell’s ultra libertarian zero government regulation views? How is it compatible to his concepts of personal freedom to mandate how an individual can or cannot make a living based on who their parent or sibling is?

And where do you draw the line? Jimmy Carter sold his family peanut farm to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Should Billy have sold his gas station? Did that play a role in Jimmy’s response to the oil crisis of the late ‘70s? What about Billy Beer, should that have been allowed to happen?

Trump famously refused to divest his businesses. Yet Russell thinks the trump kids should’ve been forced to give up their business dealings?

It’s not like this isn’t a mature debate, maybe Russell could’ve provided more nuance and a better thought out argument.

So, there we go, three weeks in to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Russell still hasn’t done a video about the anti-war protests. And now that free media within Russia has been shut down, it’s likely we’ll not see many more news pieces on that subject. Lucky escape for Russell. Would hate for him to look like a hypocrite! It is funny though that, when Russell couldn’t find the news stories with the bias that he wanted for the trucker protests, he had to trawl the internet and was forced to twice use Russia Today sources (although he only acknowledged one as an actual RT source). There’s some kind of irony there, I’m sure.

So, what do YOU think? Should we support the president’s entire extended family for life to avoid the appearance of impropriety? Would that be pretty much like the British royal family? Is the British royal family all reptilian shape shifters? Is that why prince Andrew doesn’t sweat? Or do the royal family actually own the USA because of the (((Rothschilds)))? Or is this all just part of the (((Globalist’s))) great reset? And what does any of this mean for Ukraine? And if Russell is rumored to have such a small penis, why is he such a massive bell end?

For the answers to these questions and more, tune in to the next saga of Russell Brand’s descent into lunacy on YouTube!

EDIT: I forgot to mention, he described the Guardian as “neo-liberal”. Lol.